4968.2001-10-12.farmer.ham.txt 1.3 KB

12345678910111213141516
  1. Subject: path manager rewrite
  2. desk managers ,
  3. i wanted to follow - up from the staff meeting this week on the item to get a representative from each of the desks , who will be the designated tester in addition to richard . please respond with that person name .
  4. matt ,
  5. it would be helpful to all us to know when you will need these resources so we can manage the workload .
  6. regards ,
  7. tammy
  8. - - - - - original message - - - - -
  9. from : pena , matt
  10. sent : monday , october 08 , 2001 4 : 26 pm
  11. to : pinion , richard ; jaquet , tammy ; superty , robert ; pena , matt
  12. cc : warner , john ; ripley , brian ; d ' souza , romeo ; rao , ramesh
  13. subject : path manager rewrite / optimization project
  14. importance : high
  15. all :
  16. we ' re currently identifying processes that are inefficient and could possibly benefit from being rewritten or not even performed . going foward , i would like bob to appoint a lead business person to whom we could ask questions and or suggest ideas to so that they could in turn validate this information with the desk managers / schedulers . we had this approach with nomlogic and having clarissa work the issues worked quite nicely . who ever you choose , we would need about 15 % of their time for now . later on , with coordination efforts and testing , it may go up to 75 % . i don ' t see that happening for a while though .