3047.2000-12-07.farmer.ham.txt 1.3 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
  1. Subject: spinnaker - supply verification 11958 su - october 2000 production
  2. fyi .
  3. bob
  4. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by robert cotten / hou / ect on 12 / 07 / 2000 09 : 49
  5. am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  6. christy sweeney
  7. 12 / 07 / 2000 09 : 38 am
  8. to : gary bryan / hou / ect @ ect
  9. cc : vance l taylor / hou / ect @ ect , nick moshou / corp / enron @ enron , robert
  10. cotten / hou / ect @ ect
  11. subject : spinnaker - supply verification 11958 su - october 2000 production
  12. gary ,
  13. when spinnaker got paid , the volumes inadvertently got averaged over the
  14. month . since spinnaker was paid gas
  15. daily pricing for the month , there is going to be a dollar discrepancy when
  16. the volumes are re - sent over on the actual
  17. day of flow . in my calculations ( using gas daily less $ . 21 as the price ) we
  18. are going to owe spinnaker an additional
  19. $ 220 , 398 . 57 .
  20. one issue that needs to be addressed is this : should the additional money go
  21. directly to spinnaker since they are allocating
  22. out october 2000 production payments to ranger and houston exploration ?
  23. attached is a spreadsheet showing where i came up with the extra money owed :
  24. thank you all ! !
  25. christy
  26. 39050
  27. ps this does not address the issue between the onshore and offshore meter ,
  28. this is just addressing the redistribution
  29. of volumes for the month of october .