| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829 |
- Subject: spinnaker - supply verification 11958 su - october 2000 production
- fyi .
- bob
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by robert cotten / hou / ect on 12 / 07 / 2000 09 : 49
- am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- christy sweeney
- 12 / 07 / 2000 09 : 38 am
- to : gary bryan / hou / ect @ ect
- cc : vance l taylor / hou / ect @ ect , nick moshou / corp / enron @ enron , robert
- cotten / hou / ect @ ect
- subject : spinnaker - supply verification 11958 su - october 2000 production
- gary ,
- when spinnaker got paid , the volumes inadvertently got averaged over the
- month . since spinnaker was paid gas
- daily pricing for the month , there is going to be a dollar discrepancy when
- the volumes are re - sent over on the actual
- day of flow . in my calculations ( using gas daily less $ . 21 as the price ) we
- are going to owe spinnaker an additional
- $ 220 , 398 . 57 .
- one issue that needs to be addressed is this : should the additional money go
- directly to spinnaker since they are allocating
- out october 2000 production payments to ranger and houston exploration ?
- attached is a spreadsheet showing where i came up with the extra money owed :
- thank you all ! !
- christy
- 39050
- ps this does not address the issue between the onshore and offshore meter ,
- this is just addressing the redistribution
- of volumes for the month of october .
|
