| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839 |
- Subject: cleco deals 449243 & 397957 / state tract 121 ( meter 785 )
- fred or anita ,
- i just wanted to recap our discussion to be sure that we are all on the same
- page . from my understanding , the allocation for meter 785 : state tract 121
- is supplied from bryancy braumley . prior to 09 / 1 / 00 bryancy would calculate
- flow from certain wellheads , total this volume , and then send us an
- allocation that would show how much gas was allocated to texas general land
- and hpl ( sale from cleco ) at meter 785 . effective 09 / 1 / 00 a compressor was
- put in and the gas from 785 now flows through this compressor , as well as the
- gas from meter 9662 ( deal 137595 sales from dewbre ) , and is now measured at
- meter 3527 : tivoli station . for bryancy ' s allocation , she must take the meter
- statement from meter 3527 and deduct meter 9662 ' s flow . once this is done ,
- she can take that net number and do an allocation between texas general land
- and hpl ( cleco ) like she has done previously . i believe meter 785 is now a
- check meter and meter 3527 is the actual pay meter .
- for 9 / 00 there were two deals in place for the sale from cleco , deal 397957
- and 449243 . per discussions with daren farmer , danny conner , and jennifer
- martinez , i have been instructed to zero out the deal for 397957 and use
- 449243 as the correct deal number . therefore , fred boas and i have zeroed
- out the 397957 deal and placed the volume that was allocated there to deal
- 449243 . deal 397957 was priced at ship less . 18 which was incorrect and deal
- 449243 is priced at ship less . 15 . therefore , an adjustment will generate
- for 9 / 00 for the difference in price and the change in location . the
- allocated volume for cleco did not change . however , i am not sure that
- bryancy is allocating the volume properly between texas general land and hpl
- ( cleco ) . i have spoke to her , as well as jennifer martinez , and curtis
- funderbruk with cleco so there might be some pma ' s for volume differences .
- in addition , i have changed the allocation method at meter 3527 to be a
- callout \ swing effect 9 / 00 . for october and succeeding months , the volume
- should be computed by taking meter 3527 deducting out meter 9662 . then
- byancy should take this net number and split it between texas general land
- and hpl ( cleco ) . the texas general land nom is currently at meter 785 and
- the hpl ( cleco ) deal is at meter 3527 . fred mentioned that the texas general
- land nom might need to be moved to meter 3527 but nothing has been decided on
- that yet .
- please let me know if something i have stated is not your understanding or
- you need something more done on my end . also , let me know who is going to be
- doing this monthly allocation . it might be beneficial to have one person
- doing all the points ( meters 3527 , 9662 , 785 ) . thanks for your help ! ! !
|
