| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132 |
- Subject: re : cornhusker
- if the plants become an external counterparty , the fee should probably go
- back to the
- scale in the original contract . the assumption being that the original plant
- financing could afford
- the escalating fee .
- let me know if you want me to look into it any further .
- thanks
- bob
- daren j farmer @ ect
- 09 / 20 / 2000 07 : 38 am
- to : thomas a martin / hou / ect @ ect , bob m hall / na / enron @ enron , steve
- jackson / hou / ect @ ect
- cc :
- subject : cornhusker
- please read the message below . what do you think about increasing the fee ?
- d
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by daren j farmer / hou / ect on 09 / 20 / 2000 07 : 32
- am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- john griffith @ enron
- 09 / 19 / 2000 11 : 28 am
- to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
- cc :
- subject : cornhusker
- darren ,
- how are things going ? just a note to reiterate what we talked about
- yesterday . rick hill wanted to know what the admin fee would be if the fee
- was for an outside counterparty . this admin fee would be for the life of the
- project ( through 2019 ) . also , mike mazowita should be calling you to talk
- about the plant being down this week through the end of the month . please
- let me know if you have any questions or concerns . thanks .
- john
|
