Subject: re : cornhusker if the plants become an external counterparty , the fee should probably go back to the scale in the original contract . the assumption being that the original plant financing could afford the escalating fee . let me know if you want me to look into it any further . thanks bob daren j farmer @ ect 09 / 20 / 2000 07 : 38 am to : thomas a martin / hou / ect @ ect , bob m hall / na / enron @ enron , steve jackson / hou / ect @ ect cc : subject : cornhusker please read the message below . what do you think about increasing the fee ? d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by daren j farmer / hou / ect on 09 / 20 / 2000 07 : 32 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - john griffith @ enron 09 / 19 / 2000 11 : 28 am to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect cc : subject : cornhusker darren , how are things going ? just a note to reiterate what we talked about yesterday . rick hill wanted to know what the admin fee would be if the fee was for an outside counterparty . this admin fee would be for the life of the project ( through 2019 ) . also , mike mazowita should be calling you to talk about the plant being down this week through the end of the month . please let me know if you have any questions or concerns . thanks . john