1446.2000-06-22.farmer.ham.txt 2.4 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445
  1. Subject: re : fuel
  2. application of the fuel retained from transportation and treating contracts
  3. doesn ' t have to be done by zone or compressor , in fact i am sure there will
  4. be times when we are either short or long compressor fuel when compared to
  5. the pipelines total usage . usually , short . i just do not think the market
  6. will let me lay off all of this risk . it would be really nice if we could
  7. get the system to track compressor fuel used to service specific contracts
  8. but i am afraid it will always be a facility planning issue . fuel should not
  9. cause imbalances on the transportation contract . a pipeline could be long
  10. fuel due to not running compression and in that case we would have to inject
  11. or hold in linepack the excess . it seems that we would look at fuel on a
  12. total basis .
  13. michael eiben
  14. 06 / 22 / 2000 01 : 09 pm
  15. to : brenda f herod / hou / ect @ ect
  16. cc : lisa csikos / hou / ect @ ect , daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect , mary m
  17. smith / hou / ect @ ect , rita wynne / hou / ect @ ect , steve venturatos / hou / ect @ ect , pat
  18. clynes / corp / enron @ enron , edward d gottlob / hou / ect @ ect
  19. subject : re : fuel
  20. we need to discuss further . my concern would be that how do we know what %
  21. hpl should be retaining at a compressor or zone to make sure we recoup our
  22. fuel cost ? also , could allocated fuel cause a contract imbalance ? i think
  23. that pipeline operations can handle the scheduling of third party fuel
  24. retainage . but , if we retain fuel on ena transports , then we need to come up
  25. with a plan to nominate this in marketing operations to houston pipeline .
  26. currently , this process is not in place .
  27. enron north america corp .
  28. from : brenda f herod 06 / 22 / 2000 12 : 35 pm
  29. to : lisa csikos / hou / ect @ ect , daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect , mary m
  30. smith / hou / ect @ ect , rita wynne / hou / ect @ ect , steve venturatos / hou / ect @ ect , pat
  31. clynes / corp / enron @ enron , michael eiben / hou / ect @ ect
  32. cc : edward d gottlob / hou / ect @ ect
  33. subject : re : fuel
  34. what is the answer ? can the systems and processes handle this ? please let
  35. me know asap . thanks .
  36. edward d gottlob
  37. 06 / 22 / 2000 10 : 57 am
  38. to : bherod @ enron . com
  39. cc :
  40. subject : fuel
  41. brenda ,
  42. as you know fuel is a big risk . one of the things we are trying to do is get
  43. the shipper to pay fuel . this would mean we would purchase , transport and
  44. possibly sell gas with a fuel percentage as part of the price . can the
  45. downstream systems , scheduling etc handle this ?