| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637 |
- Subject: re : revised nomination - june , 2000
- daren ,
- fyi . per our discussion , the following nominations were revised on eog
- resources :
- meter # orig nom rev nom deal #
- 5263 4 , 755 5 , 820 126355
- 6067 3 , 726 4 , 600 126281
- 6748 2 , 005 3 , 300 126360
- 6742 4 , 743 10 , 120 126365
- 6296 5 , 733 2 , 300 126281
- bob
- daren j farmer
- 05 / 31 / 2000 05 : 51 pm
- to : robert cotten / hou / ect @ ect
- cc :
- subject : re : revised nomination - june , 2000
- bob ,
- go ahead and accept the nom revision . i believe that this is with pge , not
- el paso . how do the rest of our noms compare with eog ? i f they have a
- higher volume at another meter than we do , i would like to increase our nom
- there . in effect , i want to keep our physical index position as close as
- possible to what we have in the system now .
- d
- enron north america corp .
- from : robert cotten 05 / 31 / 2000 04 : 04 pm
- to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
- cc :
- subject : revised nomination - june , 2000
- daren ,
- charlotte hawkins is having trouble confirming the volume of 5 , 733 with el
- paso . el paso will not confirm the volume that high . eog revised their
- nomination as follows :
- c / p name meter # orig nom rev nom
- eog res . 6296 5 , 733 2 , 300
- will you approve revising the volume in unify down to 2 , 300 ? please advise .
- thanks .
- bob
|
