| 123456789101112131415161718192021 |
- Subject: re : prelminary findings on deals not bridging
- matt pena
- 11 / 15 / 2000 12 : 09 pm
- to : robert superty / hou / ect @ ect
- cc : edward terry / hou / ect @ ect , victor lamadrid / hou / ect @ ect , pat
- clynes / corp / enron @ enron , donna greif / hou / ect @ ect , richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect ,
- patti sullivan / hou / ect @ ect , george smith / hou / ect @ ect , randall l
- gay / hou / ect @ ect , tricia spence / hou / ect @ ect , carlos j rodriguez / hou / ect @ ect ,
- tom acton / corp / enron @ enron
- subject : prelminary findings on deals not bridging
- i ' ve attached a spreadsheet showing deals that were not bridged to unify for
- november . please don ' t let this alarm you , this is how the bridge has always
- worked . if you have questions or would like to discuss , please let me know .
- every instance i ' ve found looks okay because of the following :
- * a transport ut ticket on the same pipe was the deal
- * the deal was killed
- * the deal was entered as a mistake buy and should of been a sell hence the
- inactive state in unify
- * the deal was a demand based deal price with no volumes
- * the deal didn ' t have a point assigned to it , only a zone
- thanks
|
