| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960 |
- Subject: re : big cowboy for august
- mary :
- is the issue below confirmed volumes versus actual flow ? the large variance
- between confirmed and actuals began in june 2000 where 30 mmbtu was scheduled
- for dix ranch and zero for the big cowboy and big cowboy # 2 wells . it
- appears that the volumes for these wells were scheduled at despain where
- 985 , 350 mmbtu was confirmed . this well has never flowed this much volume ,
- and in june 2000 it flowed approximately 320 , 000 mmbtu . do we actually have
- support ( i . e we talked with someone or have a nom sheet ) for the 985 , 350
- mmbtu that was entered into mops as confirmed ? this trend of " nothing " being
- confirmed at these three wells continued until july 2000 . in august 2000
- this scenario changed and 612 , 388 was confirmed at dix ranch and nothing was
- scheduled at the big cowboy and big cowboy # 2 wells .
- from reading your memo below it also appears that more volume is flowing at
- these wells that we expected . if the issue is an actual increase in the
- volumes flowing at these wells , i would suggest that you call our gas
- measurement department and ask them to audit coral ' s charts . coral may be is
- calculating the volumes incorrectly .
- this could also be an allocations issue . the allocation as it is in the
- system today closely agrees with the allocation statement that i receive
- monthly from karen lambert at tejas . the only differences between the tejas
- schedule and what is in mops are the acock production and gain or loss which
- are not scheduled and therefore not allocated . i know that you are working
- on the acock production and tom acton and i are working on the gain / loss .
- tom will tell me how to path the gas so that i can set up accounting
- arrangements for april 1999 forward . scheduling will have analyze and
- possibly rework january through march 1999 because these months were
- originally set up in pops .
- i want to help , so if i have missed the issue ( s ) would you please clarify it
- or them for me and let me know if i need to do anything for you .
- thanks ,
- fred
- tom acton @ enron
- 09 / 28 / 2000 08 : 10 am
- to : fred boas / hou / ect @ ect
- cc :
- subject : big cowboy for august
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by tom acton / corp / enron on 09 / 28 / 2000 08 : 09
- am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- mary poorman
- 09 / 27 / 2000 03 : 56 pm
- to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect , tom acton / corp / enron @ enron
- cc : clem cernosek / hou / ect @ ect , howard b camp / hou / ect @ ect
- subject : big cowboy for august
- daren & tom ,
- beginning with august production , i noticed that big cowboy , into king ranch
- appeared to be flowing approximately 9 m over the nomination / day . per a
- conversation i had with fred boas today , i discovered that two wells with
- zero noms flowed a considerable volume .
- they are as follows :
- rocher big cowboy ( 27002 ) - 42 , 000 approx .
- big cowboy # 2 ( 27003 - 84 , 000 approx .
- total flow : 126 , 000 mm ' s , more or less
- i think that this may be part of the production increase which we are trying
- to account for , in addition to the acock production at the briscoe well which
- came on in august . please let me know what you think . i would like to make
- sure that we are capturing our purchases correctly for both accounting and
- our economics .
- thank you ,
- mary
|
