PrivacyScanData/ML/Machine-Learining-Security/web安全之机器学习入门/data/enron1/ham/2143.2000-09-05.farmer.ham.txt

Subject: re : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
10 , 000 should be allocated to adonis # 51862 on the 5 th only . nothing should
be allocated or confirmed for adonis on the 16 th . additionally , it looks
like 5000 was confirmed as a receipt from mitchell ( track id 3167 ) on the
16 th . this should be - 0 - also . by taking the conf / allocation for adonis
( track id 6155 ) and mitchell ( track id 3167 ) to zero on the 16 th , the meter
balance remains the same and the bridge errors will be cleared .
d
jackie young
08 / 24 / 2000 08 : 33 am
to : karen lindley / corp / enron @ enron , sherlyn schumack / hou / ect @ ect
cc : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
karen / sherlyn ,
gary has placed this in daren ' s lap . please read the below information that
was requested of me from daren .
this is the latest .
i ' ll get back as soon as i hear from daren again about my response to him .
- jackie -
3 - 9497
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by jackie young / hou / ect on 08 / 24 / 2000 08 : 32
am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
jackie young
08 / 23 / 2000 04 : 27 pm
to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : re : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
on day 5 in mops ( hpl / ena ) there is a delivery nom of 10 . 0 pathed to the ena
201 k . on day 16 in mops ( hpl / ena ) there is not a deal ( which is strange
because day 16 in pops references adonis ) . the deal on the 5 th was a swing
deal .
daren j farmer
08 / 23 / 2000 12 : 59 pm
to : jackie young / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
jackie ,
what does mops show for the days in question ? it would be incorrect to add
any days to the adonis ticket mentioned below . it sounds as if the meter was
allocated incorrectly in pops and / or a deal was not pathed correctly in
mops . let me know what you find in mops .
d
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by daren j farmer / hou / ect on 08 / 23 / 2000
12 : 54 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
enron north america corp .
from : gary w lamphier 08 / 22 / 2000 02 : 51 pm
to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by gary w lamphier / hou / ect on 08 / 22 / 2000
02 : 51 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
from : sherlyn schumack 08 / 22 / 2000 02 : 07 pm
to : jackie young / hou / ect @ ect , karen lindley / corp / enron @ enron
cc : gary w lamphier / hou / ect @ ect
subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
here is the issue for 1 / 16 / 99 at meter 984132 .
20 , 000 mmbtu were confirmed for adonis in pops . 10 , 000 mmbtu on day 5 and
day 16 . day 16 is not valid for deal 51862 ( track id 6155 ) , which is where
10 , 000 was confirmed . the actual sale to adonis was 10 , 000 which was
invoiced and paid by adonis . we are trying to clear the feedback error
report . my question is why was 10 , 000 confirmed on 1 / 16 / 99 if the date is
not valid for the deal ?
when karen allocates the actual 10 , 000 it is prorating 5 , 000 for each day
that is confirmed ( the 5 th and 16 th ) .
should the whole 10 , 000 be allocated to the 5 th or should 5 , 000 be allocated
to each day ? if 5 , 000 should be allocated to each day , the 16 th needs to be
added to the deal .