2077.2000-08-30.farmer.ham.txt 2.1 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344
  1. Subject: meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
  2. hi daren ,
  3. can you give us a status on this request ?
  4. thanks
  5. - jackie -
  6. 3 - 9497
  7. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by jackie young / hou / ect on 08 / 30 / 2000 12 : 22
  8. pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  9. daren j farmer
  10. 08 / 23 / 2000 12 : 59 pm
  11. to : jackie young / hou / ect @ ect
  12. cc :
  13. subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
  14. jackie ,
  15. what does mops show for the days in question ? it would be incorrect to add
  16. any days to the adonis ticket mentioned below . it sounds as if the meter was
  17. allocated incorrectly in pops and / or a deal was not pathed correctly in
  18. mops . let me know what you find in mops .
  19. d
  20. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by daren j farmer / hou / ect on 08 / 23 / 2000
  21. 12 : 54 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  22. enron north america corp .
  23. from : gary w lamphier 08 / 22 / 2000 02 : 51 pm
  24. to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
  25. cc :
  26. subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
  27. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by gary w lamphier / hou / ect on 08 / 22 / 2000
  28. 02 : 51 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  29. from : sherlyn schumack 08 / 22 / 2000 02 : 07 pm
  30. to : jackie young / hou / ect @ ect , karen lindley / corp / enron @ enron
  31. cc : gary w lamphier / hou / ect @ ect
  32. subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
  33. here is the issue for 1 / 16 / 99 at meter 984132 .
  34. 20 , 000 mmbtu were confirmed for adonis in pops . 10 , 000 mmbtu on day 5 and
  35. day 16 . day 16 is not valid for deal 51862 ( track id 6155 ) , which is where
  36. 10 , 000 was confirmed . the actual sale to adonis was 10 , 000 which was
  37. invoiced and paid by adonis . we are trying to clear the feedback error
  38. report . my question is why was 10 , 000 confirmed on 1 / 16 / 99 if the date is
  39. not valid for the deal ?
  40. when karen allocates the actual 10 , 000 it is prorating 5 , 000 for each day
  41. that is confirmed ( the 5 th and 16 th ) .
  42. should the whole 10 , 000 be allocated to the 5 th or should 5 , 000 be allocated
  43. to each day ? if 5 , 000 should be allocated to each day , the 16 th needs to be
  44. added to the deal .