| 12345678910111213141516171819 |
- Subject: meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by gary w lamphier / hou / ect on 08 / 22 / 2000
- 02 : 51 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- from : sherlyn schumack 08 / 22 / 2000 02 : 07 pm
- to : jackie young / hou / ect @ ect , karen lindley / corp / enron @ enron
- cc : gary w lamphier / hou / ect @ ect
- subject : meter 984132 for 1 / 16 / 99
- here is the issue for 1 / 16 / 99 at meter 984132 .
- 20 , 000 mmbtu were confirmed for adonis in pops . 10 , 000 mmbtu on day 5 and
- day 16 . day 16 is not valid for deal 51862 ( track id 6155 ) , which is where
- 10 , 000 was confirmed . the actual sale to adonis was 10 , 000 which was
- invoiced and paid by adonis . we are trying to clear the feedback error
- report . my question is why was 10 , 000 confirmed on 1 / 16 / 99 if the date is
- not valid for the deal ?
- when karen allocates the actual 10 , 000 it is prorating 5 , 000 for each day
- that is confirmed ( the 5 th and 16 th ) .
- should the whole 10 , 000 be allocated to the 5 th or should 5 , 000 be allocated
- to each day ? if 5 , 000 should be allocated to each day , the 16 th needs to be
- added to the deal .
|
