1673.2000-07-17.farmer.ham.txt 1.7 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
  1. Subject: cornhusker - gas management
  2. i thought it might be helpful to summarize the next steps we agreed are
  3. necessary to put a " gas agency " agreement in place between the texas desk and
  4. ponderosa pine energy , llc .
  5. mazowita and farmer to work with plant manager ( mike gough ) to determine :
  6. how power schedules are received from brazos and translated into fuel
  7. requirements
  8. the plant ' s operating flexibility to use fuel oil over natural gas
  9. how the use of fuel oil is built into the dispatch / operation decision
  10. the degree to which the plant has historically been involved with fuel
  11. suppliers beyond tgc ( i . e . , apache , williams , lone star )
  12. mazowita and farmer to work with tgc ( nancy stivers ) to determine :
  13. how gas schedules are received from the plant
  14. why there were structural differences between the apache / williams fuel supply
  15. agreements and the tgc agency agreement
  16. tgc ' s experience with optimizing value under the fuel supply agreements
  17. farmer to determine if a " form agreement " is available within ena for
  18. transactions of this nature
  19. lyons / hill to determine ( a ) if there is a need to have the gas agency
  20. agreement at the project vs . holding company level and ( b ) if bank approvals
  21. are needed as a result of the new agreement
  22. lyons / mazowita / farmer to draft agency agreement
  23. griffith to determine the best means of handling " duel fuel " capability at
  24. the plant within ena
  25. as an aside , i passed the information that daren gave me in the meeting
  26. concerning the tax certificate for the use of fuel oil on to rhett jackson ,
  27. who handled tax - related matters during the acquisition phase of this
  28. project .
  29. please keep me in the loop as these contacts are made and let me know how i
  30. can help .