0346.2000-02-04.farmer.ham.txt 2.2 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637
  1. Subject: buyer vs . seller on intercompany deals
  2. to clarify the memo that i sent yesterday concerning buyer vs . seller on
  3. intercompany deals , i want to make sure that everyone understands that not
  4. only will the seller side post on the sitara deal but that the volume
  5. feedback reconciliation report will reflect the error ( s ) associated with the
  6. buy side as well . it will no longer show the the error ( s ) generated by the
  7. sales side as it currently does . this change will coincide with the way sap
  8. reports intercompany transactions .
  9. please let me know if you have any questions or concerns .
  10. note : the volume feedback reconciliation report is the report which i
  11. distribute on a daily basis .
  12. thanks ,
  13. rhp
  14. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by regina perkins / hou / ect on 02 / 04 / 2000
  15. 10 : 20 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  16. regina perkins
  17. 02 / 03 / 2000 05 : 32 pm
  18. to : edward terry / hou / ect @ ect , katherine l kelly / hou / ect @ ect , george
  19. smith / hou / ect @ ect , mary m smith / hou / ect @ ect , daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect , jim
  20. homco / hou / ect @ ect , randall l gay / hou / ect @ ect , pat clynes / corp / enron @ enron ,
  21. bryce baxter / hou / ect @ ect , rita wynne / hou / ect @ ect , gary nelson / hou / ect @ ect
  22. cc : regina perkins / hou / ect @ ect , scott mills / hou / ect @ ect , francis s
  23. lim / hou / ect @ ect
  24. subject : buyer vs . seller on intercompany deals
  25. it has been brought to my attention that sap will not use the buyer as the
  26. governing value associated with intercompany deals but the seller .
  27. currently , sitara captures the volume bridged back on the buy side not the
  28. sales side . i wanted to make sure that those of you who would be impacted by
  29. the change were aware of how sitara would reflected the volumes associated
  30. with intercompany deals . if there are any concerns with this , please let me
  31. know as soon as possible . i will need to have an adjustment made to the
  32. volume feedback reconciliation report to reflect this change once it has been
  33. finalized . it may be a month or two before this is implemented but i wanted
  34. to make sure everyone had advance notice .
  35. if you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact me at x 39222 .
  36. thanks ,
  37. rhp